AYODHYA, THE DISPUTED LAND GIVEN TO HINDU TRUST FOR RAM TEMPLE AND ALTERNATE 5 ACERS FOR MUSLIM SUNNI WAKF BOARD TO BUILD MOSQUE IN AYODHYA.
Final conclusion of ayodhya case
1. The disputed land given to the hindus to build ram mandir.
2. Government Trust will bulid Ram temple.
3. Supreme Court said muslim were unable to establish title claim(Babari masjid) .
4. The disputed land is of 2.77 acers.
5. The prominent 5 acers of land different from this disputed land will be given to Muslim sunni wakf board to build mosque.
The bench, of justices S A Bobde, D Y Chandrachud, Ashok Bhushan and S A Nazeer. Here are 10 points from the verdict:
1. The Supreme Court in a unanimous judgment ordered that the disputed land in Ayodhya must be given to Hindus.
2. It said a suitable plot of 5 acres must be granted to Sunni Waqf Board to set up a mosque. The disputed land at Ayodhya must be given to a Board of Trustees for construction of a Ram temple. It asked the Centre to formulate scheme within 3 months.
3. The court said faith and belief of Hindus is undisputed.
4. Title over land cannot be decided on the basis of faith and belief, but as per law.
5. The court said there is enough materials to prove the Babri Masjid was not constructed on a vacant land and that It was not an Islamic structure.
6. It said damage to Babri mosque was violation of law.
7. Documentary evidence cannot be said Muslims have been able to establish possessionary rights of the inner courtyard.
8. The court dismissed the claim of Nirmohi Akahara, a religious denomination, which had sought directions to construct a Ram temple on the disputed land in Ayodhya and wanted the management rights of the premises.
9. The court said law must stand apart over politics, religion and beliefs.
10. The court said Babri masjid wasn’t built on a vacant plot.
It is also said that the clearance of this ayodhya case will not be termed as a loss or win of any group associated with this disputed land.
Sources Hindustan times
NDTV
Post a Comment